Strategic Decision-Making in Destination URLs: How It Impacts the Performance of Your Advertising Campaigns

The destination of an advertisement is an element that often goes unnoticed but has a significant impact on the performance of advertising campaigns. What happens when you change the destination URL or decide to send users to a different page? The answer depends on several factors, such as the relevance of the new page’s content, loading speed, mobile usability, and how well it aligns with the expectations created by the ad.

Changing an ad’s destination can profoundly affect conversion rates and user behaviour. Every time the landing page is modified, it impacts the user experience. For example, if the new page takes longer to load or is not mobile-friendly, users may leave before completing the desired action. If the new page does not align with the expectations set by the ad, performance may drop significantly. For instance, if the ad promises a specific offer and the landing page doesn’t clearly display it, users may feel frustrated and abandon the site. Consistency between the ad’s message and the landing page experience is crucial to maximising performance.

The new page must be optimised and aligned with the specific goals of the campaign. For example, if the focus is on lead generation, the landing page should facilitate conversion with simple forms, clear CTAs, and a seamless mobile experience. Additionally, technical aspects such as loading speed and proper structure for Google’s ad rank remain fundamental.

Another important point is that when you change an ad’s destination, advertising platforms often need time to readjust. The algorithm may need to recalibrate conversion patterns, which can temporarily affect performance. If the new page serves a similar purpose to the old one, this impact can be minimised. However, if it differs significantly, there might be a learning phase that negatively affects results for a period.

Such changes can also influence how users perceive the brand’s credibility. Each transition between ads and pages involves a fraction of a second in which the user evaluates whether the presented content remains relevant and whether it meets the expectation created. Maintaining the initial expectation can make the difference between a wasted click and a conversion.

This is why I always recommend approaching ad destination changes as a strategic decision. It is essential to analyse factors such as user intent, the technical aspects of the page (loading time, structure, metadata, keywords, mobile version), and historical performance data of the old page before making decisions. Before changing the URL, ensure that the new destination is optimised for the objective and enhances the user experience. If it does, it could lead to a considerable performance improvement. But if it’s just a change without a clear improvement in experience, it may harm the campaign’s efficiency without a valid reason.

What has been your experience when changing the destination URL in major campaigns? Has it affected your campaign performance? Let me know in the comments.

Key Factors of Ad Rank in Google Ads: How to Optimise Your Ad Visibility

In Google Ads, Ad Rank is key to determining your ad's visibility. Why do some ads stand out while others get lost among the competition? What factors truly define that ranking position, and how can we effectively optimise them to maximise results? Let’s break down the most important factors that influence Ad Rank and how each contributes to the success of your campaigns.

Ad Rank is primarily determined by three crucial elements: bid, ad quality, and the expected impact of ad assets. Each of these elements has multiple layers worth understanding, such as keyword relevance, landing page quality, and the bidding strategy used.

1. Bid: This is the maximum price you’re willing to pay for a click, but it’s not just about bidding higher. Bids often need to be aligned with an automated strategy that takes into account signals like time of day or user device. These factors influence the likelihood of conversion, as certain times of day may perform better, and different devices can affect user behaviour. Efficiency is key; bidding higher without control can increase costs without necessarily improving results.

2. Ad quality: Here, keyword relevance, ad copy, and landing page experience come into play. To stand out, keywords must align with the user’s intent, not just their search terms. The ad content needs to demonstrate to the user that they’re in the right place, building trust from the outset. Landing pages should also be fast, secure, and clearly aligned with the ad message and page experience.

3. Expected impact of ad assets: Assets like call extensions, promotions, or even the website play an important role in enhancing user experience, simplifying access to relevant information, and increasing the likelihood of engagement. This can improve CTR, and some of these elements provide extra information without leaving the SERP. Including as many assets as possible, as long as they’re relevant, can have a positive impact.

One thing to bear in mind is that not everything affects Ad Rank equally. Elements like assets (extensions) may seem secondary but, in reality, help increase CTR and improve ad relevance across different contexts, ultimately adding value to your Ad Rank.

The most common mistake is focusing solely on increasing bids to improve position. Google also evaluates relevance and user experience.

In terms of the order of importance of Ad Rank elements, ad quality takes first place. Second is bid, which determines your competitiveness in auctions. Finally, the expected impact of ad assets is the third factor; while it plays an important role, it doesn’t weigh as heavily as quality and bid in determining Ad Rank.

The factors affecting Ad Rank complement each other, and good synergy among them is what allows you to stand out in auctions.

Dynamic keyword insertion: benefits, risks and best practices

Dynamic Keyword Insertion (DKI) is a useful tool that can enhance ad ranking, but it doesn’t guarantee results and should be used carefully. As with everything in paid media, the effectiveness of such automations depends on a strategic and mindful approach that considers the specific characteristics of each campaign.

DKI allows the specific keyword a user searched for and triggered the ad to be included in the ad title, thus achieving greater perceived relevance for the user. This can lead to a higher ad ranking and potential improvements in CTR. However, this tool should not be overused. The risk of excessive or poorly optimised insertion is a loss of control over the message, leading to incoherent ads or, in the worst cases, grammatical errors or nonsensical messages for the user.

There are other codes similar to DKI that are also worth considering. Options like user location insertion {LOCATION(City)}, which allows an ad to be tailored according to the city where the device is located, or countdown codes {COUNTDOWN(yyyy-MM-dd HH

,daysBefore)}, which help convey urgency by showing the time remaining until an event. These codes add a touch of personalisation that, when applied well, can increase the relevance of the ad and, consequently, the campaign’s performance.

The key, however, is not to lose sight of the purpose of the ad, which is to convey a clear, coherent message aligned with the brand’s values, such as its tone, mission, and unique selling points. DKI and other codes should only be used when their impact is positive and aligned with the brand’s overall message. Overusing insertions can lead to a robotic experience for the user, straying from the communication any brand should aim for.

A good question to ask before implementing these codes is: can they really enhance the ad’s impact or the effectiveness of the message for the user who sees it? In some cases, it might be better to keep an ad without insertion—clear and effective—rather than trying to make it hyper-personalised at the expense of coherence.

For every automation we introduce, we should consider the context and how users will interact with our ads, ensuring that we don’t fall into generic messaging that adds no value or, worse, ends up confusing the audience.

What’s your take? Have you had any good or bad experiences using DKI in your campaigns?